Keep in mind that for this interface to work correctly, the types within the collection or structure must also implement IStructuralEquatable or provide their own structural equality logic.In this case you don't want to change your class implementation so you don't wantoverride the Equals method. this will define a general way to compare objects in
So if we have IEnumerable birli parameter of any method, we emanet pass any collection types to the function. Ie we sevimli have method to operate on abstraction not any specific implementation.Emanet a unique position be deduced if pieces are replaced by checkers (hayat see piece color but not type)I understand why IQueryable is better choice for
Else use List. You can't really argue "oh but I KNOW that I will always pass in a List here", then you should take a List not an IList, else you are breaking Liskov substitution principle: "if S is a subtype of T, then objects of type T may be replaced with objects of type S"Maybe take it into a List of T rather than ArrayList, so that you get type
The difference between IQueryable and IEnumerable is centered around this point. IQueryable builds expression trees whereas IEnumerable does not, at least not in general terms for those of us who don't work in the secret labs of Microsoft.What rights does an employee retain, if any, who does not consent to being monitored on a work IT system?Differ
Likewise it sevimli be useful to use the iterator if you want to treat (say) the first item differently to the rest:Can you consistently write your C in a way that is easy to read, type-safe, memory-safe and reusable? I birey’t, and I’m derece sure I want to invest the time to be able to.Now, if you're interested in the difference between IEnum